Enslow v. Oregon State, et al.
Plaintiff: Zachary M. Enslow
Defendant: Police Department, Multnomah County and Oregon State
Case Number: 3:2018cv01931
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Jolie A Russo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2018 Filing 7 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Zachary M. Enslow regarding Order of Dismissal - Terminate Case #6 . (ecp)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order of Dismissal. Signed on 12/12/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (ecp) Modified on 12/13/2018 to correct judge (ecp).
November 6, 2018 Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Plaintiff regarding Order 4 . (gm)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Plaintiff shall submit the requisite filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Further, the Court notes that plaintiff has filed at least seven other substantively similar actions in this District alleging virtually identical facts, all of which have been dismissed for deficiencies in the complaint and/or failure to prosecute (e.g., Enslow v. State of Oregon et al., Case Nos. 3:16-cv-00708-HZ, 3:16-cv-02099-YY, 3:17-cv-00636-YY, 3:17-cv-01058-AC, 3:18-cv-00713-MC, 3:18-cv-00142-MC, and 3:18-cv-01197-TC). Because the current complaint suffers from the same deficiencies, plaintiff must also submit an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order if he wishes to proceed with this lawsuit. (gm)
November 5, 2018 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Zachary M. Enslow regarding Case Assignment Notice #2 . (ecp)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (ecp)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint. No payment received or IFP filed. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Zachary M Enslow against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (ecp) Modified on 11/5/2018 to note no payment(ecp).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Enslow v. Oregon State, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zachary M. Enslow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Multnomah County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?