Sartin v. State of Oregon
| Homer David Sartin |
| State of Oregon |
| 3:2018cv02005 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John Jelderks |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Samuel A. Kubernick is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen Filed by State of Oregon. (Kubernick, Samuel) |
| Filing 9 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of State of Oregon. Filed by State of Oregon. (Larsen, Lynn) |
Filing 8
Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #7 on respondent. Answer is due by 3/11/2019. Signed on 1/10/2019 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service Form, #2 Amended Petition) (joha)
|
| Filing 7 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) (Fee deferral status selected.). Filed by Homer David Sartin against Homer David Sartin. (Manes, C.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney C. Renee Manes is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lisa Hay Filed by Homer David Sartin. (Manes, C.) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Petitioner's Application for Leave to Proceed IFP (#1 ) and his Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#3 ) are GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, is appointed to represent Petitioner in this proceeding. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B). Accordingly, with the assistance of newly appointed counsel, Petitioner shall file an Amended Petition within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed on 12/10/2018 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (joha) (Copy Mailed to Petitioner. Notice of Interoffice Mailing to FPD regarding Petition #2 and this Order.)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (copy mailed to petitioner) (kms) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Homer David Sartin. (kms) |
| Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State). (IFP Pending) Filed by Homer David Sartin against State of Oregon. (kms) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Homer David Sartin. (kms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sartin v. State of Oregon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Homer David Sartin | |
| Represented By: | C. Renee Manes |
| Represented By: | Lisa Hay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Oregon | |
| Represented By: | Lynn David Larsen |
| Represented By: | Samuel A. Kubernick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
