Johnson et al v. Marriott International, Inc.
| Chris Harris and David Johnson |
| Marriott International, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv02119 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case electronically transferred out to the District of Maryland. Other Court Case Number 8:19-cv-00528 assigned. (eo) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1): transferring this case to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Pursuant to MDL 2879, Docket No. 200. Certified on 2/21/19 by Deputy Clerk Katie Nader of the District of Maryland. (dsg) |
| Filing 10 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1) finalized on 2/20/19. As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Jeffery N. Luthi on 2/20/19. (dsg) |
Filing 9
ORDER: GRANTING Unopposed Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Decision by JPML (#8 ). Signed on January 4, 2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (eo)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Stay Proceedings Pending Decision by JPML. Filed by Marriott International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hineline, Curt) |
| Filing 7 Demand for Jury Trial by Marriott International, Inc. . Filed by Marriott International, Inc.. (Hineline, Curt) |
| Filing 6 Notification of CM/ECF Account for Daniel R. Warren (Pro Hac Vice admission). Your login is: drwarren. Go to #the CM/ECF login page to set your password. (ecp) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Daniel R. Warren for Marriott International, Inc.. Application Fee in amount of $300 collected. Receipt No. 0979-5674373 issued. Signed on 12/19/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (ecp) Modified on 12/20/2018 to correct file and signature date (ecp).
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel R. Warren . Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5674373. Filed by Marriott International, Inc.. (Hineline, Curt) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 4/10/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/10/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 5/10/2019. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Marriott International, Inc.. (Hineline, Curt) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 18-cv-54883 from Circuit Court of Multnomah. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5663440 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Marriott International, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A thru D to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Hineline, Curt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
