Wilson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
| Sue Wilson |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association |
| 3:2018cv02209 |
| December 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to LR 41-1, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs and with leave, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to have this order of dismissal set aside and the action reinstated if the settlement is not consummated. Pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. All pretrial deadlines and any trial date are stricken. By Clerk of Court Mary L. Moran. (dls) |
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDER: GRANTING Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #5 . The deadline for Defendant's response to the Complaint #1 is extended from 1/24/2019 to 2/14/2019. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. (Kono, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. (Kono, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed as to JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association served on 1/3/2018, answer due on 1/24/2018. (Fuller, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (eo) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 4/29/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/27/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 5/27/2019. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (eo)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5680687 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Sue Wilson against JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Fuller, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association | |
| Represented By: | Kevin H. Kono |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sue Wilson | |
| Represented By: | Michael R. Fuller |
| Represented By: | Kelly D. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
