Szanto v. Arnot
Appellee: Stephen P. Arnot
Appellant: Susan Szanto
Case Number: 3:2019cv00213
Filed: February 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael H Simon
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Filing 9 Minutes of Telephone Scheduling Conference: Order - Case No. 3:19-cv-0138-SI is removed from the cases consolidated under Lead Case No. 3:18-cv-0939-SI. The Court STAYS the following related cases until after the Court issues its Opinion and Order in Case No. 3:19-cv-0138-SI: the consolidated cases under Lead Case No. 3:18-cv-0939-SI; Case No. 3:18-cv-1841-SI; and Case No. 3:19-cv-0213-SI. Susan Szanto present pro se as Appellant. Stephen P. Arnot present as Appellee. Court Reporter: Dennis Apodaca. Judge Michael H. Simon presiding. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 3/18/2019.) (mja)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order - All deadlines are stayed pending the telephone scheduling conference set for March 18, 2019 at 10:00 AM. At that conference, the Court and the parties will discuss the briefing schedule for all the related pending cases, including Mr. Szanto's request to stay all cases except for Case No. 3:19-cv-138-SI. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
February 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Scheduling Order by Judge Michael H. Simon. Order - Setting a Telephone Conference to discuss a case schedule for 3/18/2019 at 10:00AM. The Court will provide the parties with a call-in number by separate sealed entry. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
February 21, 2019 Filing 6 Bankruptcy Appeal Scheduling Order and Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (eo)
February 19, 2019 Filing 5 Notification of CM/ECF Account for Susan Szanto (Pro Se Filer admission). Your login is: sszanto. Go to #the CM/ECF login page to set your password. (sss)
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Appellant's Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party (ECF #3 ) is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (CM/ECF Registered User). Copy mailed to Appellant on 2/19/2019. (mja)
February 19, 2019 Filing 3 Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Filed by Susan Szanto. (sss)
February 12, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (eo) Copy mailed to appellant.
February 11, 2019 Filing 1 Notice of Appeal and Order Transferring Appeal to District Court on Appellee's Election (from Bankruptcy Appellate Panel). Filed by Susan Szanto. (Attachments: #1 Order Transferring Appeal to USDC (from BAP) on Appellee's Election) (eo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Szanto v. Arnot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Stephen P. Arnot
Represented By: Stephen P. Arnot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Susan Szanto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?