Herrera Portillo v. Lance et al
| Rodolfo W. Herrera Portillo |
| Larry R. Roloff and Clayton Lance |
| 3:2019cv00222 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Objections to Findings & Recommendation #4 . Filed by Rodolfo W. Herrera Portillo. (joha) |
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Rodolfo Portillo of Findings & Recommendation #4 , Findings & Recommendation Referred 5 . (jk) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Findings & Recommendation #4 is referred to Judge Michael J. McShane. (jk)
|
| Filing 4 Findings & Recommendation: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #1 is allowed. However, plaintiff's Complaint should be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 3/15/2019. Signed on 3/1/2019 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Rodolfo W. Herrera Portillo against Clayton Lance, Larry R. Roloff. (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Rodolfo W. Herrera Portillo. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
