Frisby v. Hahn et al
| Darcy Roy Frisby |
| Lee Ferguson, Naomi Campbell, Kathy McAlpine, Washington County Sheriff's Office, John and Jane Does, City of Tigard, John Christensen, Thomas J. Hahn, McDonald, Ben Toops, Lake Oswego Police Department, Gil Millett, West Linn Police Department, Kirk Tonkin and Gabriella Schweitz |
| 3:2019cv00775 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 5/17/19.) (sb) |
| Filing 3 Affidavit of Darcy Roy Frisby. Filed by Darcy Roy Frisby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-15). (sb) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Darcy Roy Frisby against Naomi Campbell, John Christensen, City of Tigard, Lee Ferguson, Thomas J. Hahn, John and Jane Does, Lake Oswego Police Department, Kathy McAlpine, McDonald, Gil Millett, Gabriella Schweitz, Kirk Tonkin, Ben Toops, Washington County Sheriff's Office, West Linn Police Department. (sb) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Darcy Roy Frisby. (sb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
