Seib v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
| Johnny L. Seib |
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and All Other Interested Parties |
| 3:2019cv00892 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Acosta - Based on defendants filing of a Notice of Withdrawal #9 of the request for oral argument with regard to their motion to dismiss #6 and the filing on 7/17/19 of their reply brief #10 , the under advisement deadline for the motion to dismiss is RESET to 7/24/19. Mailed to Pro Se party on 7/18/19.) (peg)
|
| Filing 11 Declaration of Pilar C. French in Support of Reply to Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Related document(s): Reply to Motion #10 .) (French, Pilar) |
| Filing 10 Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #6 . Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (French, Pilar) |
| Filing 9 Notice re Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #6 (filed as "Notice of Withdrawal of Oral Argument") Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #6 .) (French, Pilar) |
| Filing 8 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss #6 . Filed by Plaintiff Johnny L. Seib. (peg) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Acosta - Defendant Met Life's Motion to Dismiss #6 will be taken under advisement as of 9/23/2019; the request for oral argument will be considered in due course. Plaintiff's response to this motion is currently due no later than 7/8/2019. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 6/25/19.) (peg)
|
| Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Oral Argument requested. Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (French, Pilar) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #4 . Defendant's due date is extended from 6/14/2019 to 6/21/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 6/13/2019.) (lj)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Notice of Removal, #1 . Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (French, Pilar) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 10/8/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/7/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 11/7/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 6/10/2019.) (joha)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (French, Pilar) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19CV16211 from Washington County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5882401 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Part 1 of 5, #2 Exhibit 1, Part 2 of 5, #3 Exhibit 1, Part 3 of 5, #4 Exhibit 1, Part 4 of 5, #5 Exhibit 1, Part 5 of 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet). (French, Pilar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
