Poulson v. Bridge et al
Kermit Ty Poulson |
FBI Agent Bridge, U.S. Government, Officer Bloomster, Dr. Platas and Officer Miller |
3:2019cv01018 |
June 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael W Mosman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Expansion of Record. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson. (dsg) |
Filing 10 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Judgment #9 sent to Kermit Ty Poulson returned as undeliverable. (joha) |
|
Filing 8 Motion to Add Exhibits. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson. (joha) (Main Document 8 replaced on 7/10/2019) (joha). |
Filing 7 Motion to Enter Exhibits Q-Z. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson. (joha) |
Filing 6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson. (sb) |
Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 6/27/2019.) (dsg) |
Filing 4 Motion to Receive Probation Instead of Incarceration. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson. (dsg) |
Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Admit Kites, and Grievances, Appeals as Articles of Evidence. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson. (dsg) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson against Bloomster, Bridge, Miller, Platas, U.S. Government. (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Kermit Ty Poulson. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.