Szanto
| Peter Szanto |
| 3:2019cv01089 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Bankruptcy Appeal Scheduling Order and Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (eo)
|
|
Filing 4
Transmittal of Record for Bankruptcy Appeal. (eo)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (eo)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Referral of Appeal to USDC. (eo)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Appeal and Optional Statement of Election to District Court. Bankruptcy Court Case Number: 16-ap-3114. The Filling Fee was paid at the Bankruptcy Court. Filed by Peter Szanto. (eo)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Szanto | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: Peter Szanto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
