Crockett v. Portland Police et al
Plaintiff: Chuck Crockett
Defendant: Portland Police and City of Portland
Case Number: 3:2019cv01090
Filed: July 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Anna J Brown
Referring Judge: Marco A Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2019 Filing 21 Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #17 . Filed by All Defendants. (Bailey, Ryan)
August 28, 2019 Filing 20 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #17 . Filed by Chuck Crockett. (ecp)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER issued by Judge Marco A. Hernandez: Striking Amendment to Amended Tort Claim #18 , which the Court construes as a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has already filed a First Amended Complaint, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) requires Plaintiff to obtain Defendant's written consent or the Court's leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has not obtained either leave of this Court or Defendant's consent prior to filing his amended complaint. The Court will consider whether to allow Plaintiff to file an amended complaint in resolving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #17 . (Mailed to Pro Se party on 8/22/19.) (gm)
August 14, 2019 Filing 18 ***STRICKEN*** Amendment to Amended Tort Claim Filed by Chuck Crockett. (ecp) Modified on 8/22/2019 per Order 19 . (gm)
August 14, 2019 Filing 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Filed by All Defendants. (Bailey, Ryan)
August 8, 2019 Filing 16 Reply. Titled, 'Response to Defendants Response to Motion for Sanctions.' Filed by Chuck Crockett. (Related document(s): Response to Motion #13 .) (sb)
August 8, 2019 Filing 15 Reply. Titled, 'Response to Defendants Response to Motion of Opposition of Removal From State Court.' Filed by Chuck Crockett. (Related document(s): Response to Motion #11 .) (sb)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: On July 26, 2019, Plaintiff filed an Amended Tort Claim #10 , which the Court construes as Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. In light of the filing of the First Amended Complaint #10 , Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #6 is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 8/7/2019.) (jp)
July 31, 2019 Filing 13 Response to Motion for Imposition of Sanctions #7 . Filed by All Defendants. (Bailey, Ryan)
July 31, 2019 Filing 12 Declaration of Ryan C. Bailey . Filed by All Defendants. (Related document(s): Response to Motion #11 .) (Bailey, Ryan)
July 31, 2019 Filing 11 Response to Motion #8 . Filed by All Defendants. (Bailey, Ryan)
July 26, 2019 Filing 10 Amended Tort Claim. Filed by Chuck Crockett. (ecp)
July 26, 2019 Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #6 . Filed by Chuck Crockett. (Attachments: #1 certificate of service) (ecp)
July 22, 2019 Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Filed by City of Portland, Portland Police. (Bailey, Ryan)
July 19, 2019 Filing 8 Motion of Opposition of Removal from State Court. Filed by Chuck Crockett. (ecp)
July 19, 2019 Filing 7 Motion for Sanction of Defendants. Filed by Chuck Crockett. (ecp)
July 17, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Attorney Withdrawal: Michael J. Jeter Filed by City of Portland, Portland Police. (Jeter, Michael)
July 16, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Anna J. Brown to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 7/16/19.) (eo)
July 15, 2019 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Chuck Crockett regarding Discovery order, #2 . (ecp)
July 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Anna J. Brown and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 11/12/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/12/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 12/12/2019. Ordered by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ecp)
July 15, 2019 Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19CV25791 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5925011 issued.. Filed by City of Portland, Portland Police (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Bailey, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crockett v. Portland Police et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chuck Crockett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portland Police
Represented By: Ryan C. Bailey
Represented By: Michael Jeter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Portland
Represented By: Ryan C. Bailey
Represented By: Michael Jeter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?