John v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
Joshy Francis John |
Avant, LLC, Westlake Services LLC, Equifax Information Services LLC and Carmax Business Services, LLC |
3:2019cv01125 |
July 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael W Mosman |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Return of Service Executed as to Westlake Services LLC served on 8/27/2019, answer due on 9/17/2019. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 16 Amended Summons Issued Electronically as to Avant, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (sb) |
Filing 15 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Joshy Francis John. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 14 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Joshy Francis John. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 13 ORDER: Defendant Carmax Business Services, LLC's Unopposed Motion #10 for Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer is GRANTED. Carmax's Answer is due on or before September 17, 2019. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Edelson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Equifax Information Services LLC's Answer and Affirmative Defenses Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Edelson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Carmax Business Services, LLC. (Jaqua, Martin) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued Electronically as to Westlake Services LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rs) |
Filing 8 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Joshy Francis John. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Service by Joshy Francis John Filed by Joshy Francis John. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Service by Joshy Francis John Filed by Joshy Francis John. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rs) |
Filing 4 Amended Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) Filed by Joshy Francis John. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) Filed by Joshy Francis John. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 11/18/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/16/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 12/16/2019. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (rs) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5932124 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Joshy Francis John against All Defendants. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.