Dickerson v. City of Portland et al
| Mark Dickerson |
| John Does 1-15, City of Portland and Multnomah County |
| 3:2019cv01126 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Stacie F Beckerman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Defendants City of Portland and Multnomah County's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #3 ). Answer or other responsive pleading is due by 10/21/2019. Ordered on 8/14/2019 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Copy of order mailed to pro se plaintiff on 8/15/2019.) (gw)
|
| Filing 4 Declaration of Robert Yamachika . Filed by City of Portland. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time #3 .) (Yamachika, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appearance. Filed by City of Portland, Multnomah County. (Yamachika, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance of James G. Rice appearing on behalf of Multnomah County Filed by on behalf of Multnomah County. (Rice, James) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Receipt No. 84735. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Mark Dickerson against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons). (jn) (Additional attachment added on 7/23/2019: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (gw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
