Meng et al v. Namnath
Plaintiff: Hesheng Meng and Changming Wu
Defendant: James Namnath
Nominal Defendant: GenericERA Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv01337
Filed: August 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Marco A Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand. Filed by James Namnath. (jn)
September 9, 2019 Filing 6 Notification of CM/ECF Account for Shengmao Mu (Pro Hac Vice admission). Your login is: shengmaomu. Go to #the CM/ECF login page to set your password. (jn)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Shengmao Mu for Hesheng Meng. Signed on 9/9/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jn)
September 9, 2019 Filing 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Shengmao Mu . Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5993520. Filed by Hesheng Meng. (DiCicco, Daniel)
August 23, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to GenericERA Inc., James Namnath. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jn)
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/23/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/21/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 1/21/2020. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jn)
August 23, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5974595 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Hesheng Meng, Changming Wu against GenericERA, Inc., James Namnath (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons). (DiCicco, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meng et al v. Namnath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hesheng Meng
Represented By: Daniel DiCicco
Represented By: Shengmao Mu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Changming Wu
Represented By: Daniel DiCicco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Nominal defendant: GenericERA Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Namnath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?