Edwards et al v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
| Cindy Edwards and Douglas Edwards |
| Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| 3:2019cv01425 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Anna J Brown |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTES of Proceedings: Rule 16 Conference. Amendment to Pleadings/Joining of Parties due 1/3/20. Initial Disclosures exchanged no later than 1/10/20; responsive disclosures exchanged no later than 1/24/20. All Discovery is to be completed by 2/28/2020. The last date to file any fact discovery motion is 2/10/20, and responses to such motions are due no later than seven (7) calendar days after the initiating motion is filed; no replies are permitted for discovery motions. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due 3/13/2020. Joint Status Report is due by 3/13/2020 regarding dispositive motions. Parties to indicate why they are warranted, on what grounds, if the parties are in agreement and a proposed schedule. If the parties indicate that no dispositive motions will be filed, parties shall indicate in the Joint Status Report a Pretrial Order and Trial Date. Parties should allow 6 weeks from the filing of the Pretrial Order to a proposed trial date Continued Rule 16 Conference is SET for 3/17/2020 at 10:00 AM in Portland by telephone before Judge Anna J. Brown. Anthony Reiner present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Jacqueline Tokiko Mitchson present as counsel for defendant(s). Court Reporter: Jill Jessup. Judge Anna J. Brown presiding. (br1) |
| Filing 6 Joint Status Report . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Reiner, Anthony) |
Filing 5
Scheduling Order by Judge Anna J. Brown. Rule 16 Conference is set for 10/9/2019 at 10:00 AM in Portland by telephone before Judge Anna J. Brown. Before the Conference, at a minimum counsel must conduct real-time conferral by telephone to prepare a proposed case-management schedule to be submitted to the Court prior to the Rule 16 Conference. The parties shall submit a written joint status report (to include proposed case management schedule) no later than 10/3/19 that include deadlines to complete discovery, to file dispositive motions, and for trial. Parties shall also determine whether they agree to forgo the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), and file separately with the Clerk of Court the form required by LR 26-2 no later than 10/3/19. (bb)
|
| Filing 4 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) . Filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Mitchson, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Anna J. Brown and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 1/6/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/3/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 2/3/2020. Ordered by Judge Anna J. Brown. (jn)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Bernstein, Lloyd) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19CV34834 from Yamhill County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5990996 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Bernstein, Lloyd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
