Keay v. Curtis
| Kevin Keay |
| Jeremy Curtis |
| 3:2019cv01481 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Civil (RICO) Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: Plaintiff's second Motion for Appointment of Counsel #11 is denied for the reasons previously stated in the October 7, 2019 order denying his prior Motion for Appointment of Counsel #7 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/21/2019.) (pvh)
|
| Filing 11 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Kevin Keay. (joha) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: referring Findings & Recommendations #9 and Complaint #1 , to Chief Judge Michael W. Mosman for his review and determination Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/7/2019.) (pvh)
|
| Filing 9 Findings & Recommendations: Plaintiff's case should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief. These Findings and Recommendations will be referred to a district judge. Objections, if any, are due Thursday, October 24, 2019. If no objections are filed, then the Findings and Recommendations will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, then a response is due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendations will go under advisement. Signed on 10/7/2019 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/7/2019.) (pvh) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for appointment of Counsel #7 is DENIED. Signed on 10/7/2019 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/7/2019.) (pvh)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Kevin Keay. (ecp) |
| Filing 6 Response to Order to Show Cause. Filed by Kevin Keay. (ecp) |
|
Filing 5
Notice to Self-Represented Litigants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/23/2019.) (pvh)
|
|
Filing 4
Order to Show Cause. Signed on 9/23/2019 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/23/2019.) (pvh)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/17/2019.) (ecp) |
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Kevin Keay. (ecp) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Kevin Keay against Jeremy Curtis (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (ecp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keay v. Curtis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Keay | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jeremy Curtis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
