Lai et al v. Chandra et al
Plaintiff: Lohani Lai and Nalene Lai
Defendant: Vivek Chandra and Manjula Devi
Case Number: 3:2019cv01502
Filed: September 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Karin J Immergut
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1725
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Scheduling Order by Judge Karin J. Immergut. Telephonic Rule 16 Conference is set for 12/2/2019 at 10:00 AM in Portland by telephone before Judge Karin J. Immergut. Before the Conference, at a minimum counsel must conduct real-time conferral by telephone to prepare a proposed case-management schedule to be submitted to the Court prior to the Rule 16 Conference. The parties shall submit a written joint status report (to include proposed case management schedule) no later than 11/27/2019 that include deadlines to complete discovery, to file dispositive motions, and for trial. Parties shall also determine whether they agree to forgo the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), and file separately with the Clerk of Court the form required by LR 26-2 no later than 11/27/2019. (jy)
September 24, 2019 Filing 4 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) . Filed by Manjula Devi, Vivek Chandra. (Haddad, Joseph)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 1/16/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/18/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 2/18/2020. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (joha)
September 18, 2019 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Notice of Removal, #1 . Filed by All Defendants. (Haddad, Joseph)
September 17, 2019 Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19CV32929 from Columbia County State of Oregon. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-6004888 issued.. Filed by Manjula Devi, Vivek Chandra (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C). (Haddad, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lai et al v. Chandra et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vivek Chandra
Represented By: Joseph James Haddad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manjula Devi
Represented By: Joseph James Haddad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lohani Lai
Represented By: Scott Michael Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nalene Lai
Represented By: Scott Michael Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?