Nesbit v. Tuck et al
Kevin Nesbit |
Steven Campbell and Jason Tuck |
3:2019cv01611 |
October 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Marco A Hernandez |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is granted. The Complaint #2 is dismissed with leave to amend. The Clerk's Office is directed to withhold issuance of any summons until further order of the Court. The motion to appoint counsel #3 is denied. Any amended complaint is due within twenty-one (21) days of Opinion & Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 11/15/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/15/2019.) (pvh) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/8/2019.) (joha) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Kevin Nesbit. (joha) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Kevin Nesbit against Steven Campbell, Jason Tuck. (joha) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Kevin Nesbit. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.