Young v. U.S. Attorney General
| Timothy Doyle Young |
| U.S. Attorney General |
| 3:2019cv01642 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USCA Case Number and Notice confirming Docketing Record on Appeal re Notice of Appeal #8 . Case Appealed to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 19-35943 assigned. (jtj) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit. Related Documents: Judgment #7 and Order Dismissing Case #6 . (No IFP Granted and No Fee Paid). Filed by Timothy Doyle Young. (dsg) |
Filing 7
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is dismissed. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Signed on 10/18/2019 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/21/2019.) (joha)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO DISMISS: See Order for Details. Signed on 10/18/2019 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/21/2019.) (joha)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/11/19.) (eo) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of California Northern; Case Number 3:19-cv-06317. Electronic file received. |
| The United States District Court for the District of Oregon shall receive the contact information from this court via email/telephone transfer. Re #3 Order (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/11/2019.] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER. This action is transferred to the District of Oregon. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/11/2019.]
|
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/12/2019. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/11/2019.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus; (NO PROGRESS); (IFP PENDING). Filed byTimothy Doyle Young. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/11/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Young v. U.S. Attorney General | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: U.S. Attorney General | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Timothy Doyle Young | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
