Three Pine One, LLC v United States General Services Administration et al
| Three Pine One, LLC |
| United States General Services Administration, Mt. Hood Champion, LLC and General Services Administration of the United States of America |
| 3:2019cv01655 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09:1 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to General Services Administration of the United States of America. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rs) |
| Filing 4 Amended Proposed Summons to United States General Services Administration Filed by Three Pine One, LLC. (Radmacher, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons to United States General Services Administration Filed by Three Pine One, LLC. (Radmacher, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (rs) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Order Compelling Attendance at Arbitration Hearing Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-6040732. Filed by Three Pine One, LLC against United States General Services Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Radmacher, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
