Spang v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Pamela F Spang and Pamela F. Spang
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2019cv01678
Filed: October 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: John V Acosta
Referring Judge: Michael W Mosman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Michael W. Mosman to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (eo)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge..
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 10/25/2019, answer due on 2/24/2020. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Evans, H.)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jtj)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: DENYING Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Filing Fee must be paid by 11/20/2019. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (jtj)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-6049965 Related Document: #1 Social Security Complaint,. Filed by Pamela F. Spang. (Evans, H.)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Pamela F Spang. (Evans, H.)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Pamela F Spang against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Evans, H.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spang v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela F Spang
Represented By: H. Peter Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela F. Spang
Represented By: H. Peter Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?