Intellicad Technology Consortium v. Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.
| The Intellicad Technology Consortium and Intellicad Technology Consortium |
| Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd. |
| 3:2019cv01963 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 First Amended Complaint . Filed by Intellicad Technology Consortium against Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A). (Lindsay, Shawn) |
Filing 13
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #10 . Signed on 1/23/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (ecp)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond (ECF 7) is GRANTED. Defendant shall have until February 28, 2020 to answer or other respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Any further requests for extension will be disfavored. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (dls)
|
| Filing 11 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint Complaint, #1 #7 . Filed by Intellicad Technology Consortium. (Berne, Craig) |
| Filing 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kyle R. Canavera . Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: 0979-6132455. Filed by Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.. (Markley, Julia) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.. (Markley, Julia) |
| Filing 8 Declaration of Julia E. Markley in Support of Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Filed by Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #7 .) (Markley, Julia) |
| Filing 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint Complaint, #1 . Filed by Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.. (Markley, Julia) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Order) (Berne, Craig) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Alternative Service (ECF #4 ) is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Alternative Service. Oral Argument requested. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Decl of Shawn Lindsay, #2 Attachment Decl of David Lorenzo) (Berne, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael H. Simon and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 4/2/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/4/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 5/4/2020. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (joha)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-6106655 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by The Intellicad Technology Consortium against All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Attachment Corporate Disclosure Statement). (Berne, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
