Condello v. Columbia County
| Linda Condello |
| Columbia County |
| 3:2019cv01985 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Anna J Brown |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Scheduling Order by Judge Anna J. Brown. Telephonic Rule 16 Conference is set for 2/19/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Anna J. Brown. Before the Conference, at a minimum counsel must conduct real-time conferral by telephone to prepare a proposed case-management schedule to be submitted to the Court prior to the Rule 16 Conference. The parties shall submit a written joint status report (to include proposed case management schedule) no later than 2/13/2020 that include deadlines to complete discovery, to file dispositive motions, and for trial. Parties shall also determine whether they agree to forgo the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), and file separately with the Clerk of Court the form required by LR 26-2 no later than 2/13/2020. (bb)
|
|
Filing 8
Certificate of Service by Columbia County of Answer to Complaint #7 Filed by Columbia County. (Kurtz, Louis)
|
|
Filing 7
Answer to #1 Complaint . Filed by Columbia County. (Kurtz, Louis)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued Electronically as to Columbia County. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rs)
|
|
Filing 5
Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Linda Condello. (Johnstun, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons Filed by Linda Condello. (Johnstun, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Letter to plaintiff's counsel Filed by Columbia County. (Kurtz, Louis)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Anna J. Brown and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 4/6/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/4/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 5/4/2020. Ordered by Judge Anna J. Brown. (rs)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-6112316 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Linda Condello against Columbia County (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Johnstun, Jacob)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Condello v. Columbia County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Columbia County | |
| Represented By: | Louis L. Kurtz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Condello | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Johnstun |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
