Moseley v. Bruns et al
| Lori Ann Moseley |
| Capt A Bruns, Dolly Rowlands, Lisa Arrington, Paula Meyers, Oper. Capt Mr Bruns, Polly Rowlands and Mr. Bruns |
| 3:2019cv02045 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver of Service is due by 2/24/2020.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/23/2020.) (Emailed notice and complaint to ODOJ) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT FILING FEE: Plaintiffs Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #1 is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the Oregon Department of Corrections shall collect from plaintiffs prison trust account the $350.00 filing fee and shall forward payments to the Clerk of the Court. Signed on 1/23/2020 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed to Pro Se party and ODOC on 1/23/2020.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/17/2019.) (joha)
|
|
Filing 2
Complaint. Filed by Lori Ann Moseley against All Defendants. (joha)
|
|
Filing 1
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Lori Ann Moseley. (joha)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
