Wilson v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
| Mary E. Wilson |
| Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
| 3:2019cv02104 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2675 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement. Filed by Mary E. Wilson. (sb) |
| Filing 9 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (sb) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Secretary of Veterans Affairs. (Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service.) (fp) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The deadline for Plaintiff to prepare summons was due 1/30/2020, per this Courts Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 . To date, Plaintiff has failed to provide the court with summons and USM 285 forms. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The deadline to respond to this order is 02/28/2020. Failure to respond to this order will result in this case being dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 2/7/2020.) (kms)
|
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Mary E. Wilson regarding Order on motion/application for leave to proceed IFP #4 . (sb) |
|
Filing 5
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 5/5/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/4/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 6/4/2020. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/6/2020.) (sb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/31/19.) (dls)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/30/2019.) (jn) |
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Mary E. Wilson. (jn) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Mary E. Wilson against Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (jn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Secretary of Veterans Affairs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary E. Wilson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
