Aplin et al v. Multnomah County et al
Crown Princess Tesla Aplin and William Aplin, III |
Multnomah County Sheriff Office, Multnomah County Detention Center and Multnomah County |
3:2020cv00011 |
January 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mustafa T Kasubhai |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Motion to Correct and Motion for Imposition of Sanctions. Filed by Tesla Aplin. (dsg) |
Filing 4 ORDER Denying Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 . Amended Application to Proceed Informa Pauperis due within 30 days from the date of this Order with the required certification of inmate trust account. The amended IFP application must bear Civil No. 3:20-cv-00011-MK. Signed on 1/9/20 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed with IFP Form to Pro Se party on 1/9/20.) (kf) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/3/2020.) (dsg) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Tesla Aplin against Multnomah County, Multnomah County Detention Center, Multnomah County Sheriff Office. (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Tesla Aplin. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.