Heinemann v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Michelle Kaye Heinemann |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv00447 |
| March 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
JUDGMENT. Signed on 2/7/2022 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
|
Filing 18
OPINION & ORDER: The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. Signed on 2/7/2022 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
|
Filing 17
Plaintiffs Reply Brief . Filed by Michelle Kaye Heinemann. (Kerr, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 16
Defendants Brief . Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. Plaintiffs optional reply brief is due by 5/21/2021. Social Security case is taken under advisement as of 5/28/2021. (Phillips, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time #14 . Defendant's brief is due by 5/7/2021. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
|
Filing 14
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time . Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Phillips, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 13
Plaintiffs Brief . Filed by Michelle Kaye Heinemann. Defendants brief is due by 4/9/2021. (Kerr, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 12
Transcript of Social Security Administrative Record - Certification and Record of Service . Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. Plaintiffs brief is due by 2/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 complete CAR) (Phillips, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 11
Answer to #1 Social Security Complaint, . Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Phillips, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 . Answer and transcript are due by 12/8/2020. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
|
Filing 9
Declaration of Jacob Phillips . Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #8 .) (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis) (Phillips, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Social Security Complaint, #1 . Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Phillips, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 7
Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 6/15/2020, answer due on 10/13/2020. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Electronic Signatures) (Kerr, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Complaint #17 in this matter was filed on March 17, 2020, and a Summons was issued on March 19, 2020. Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(c)(1) and 4(m), Plaintiff is responsible for serving the Complaint and summons on Defendant within 90 days of filing the Complaint. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1), proof of service of the summons and Complaint must be made to the Court. More than 90 days has elapsed since the Summons was issued, and no proof of service has been filed with the Court. Thus, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff appear in writing within 14 days from the date of this Order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to timely serve Defendant. If response is not received by August 21, 2020, then this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (cw)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jn)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
|
Filing 3
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jn)
|
|
Filing 2
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Michelle Kaye Heinemann. (Kerr, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Michelle Kaye Heinemann against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Kerr, Kevin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heinemann v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
| Represented By: | Jacob Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Kaye Heinemann | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Kerr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
