Vitort v. The Kroger Company et al
Plaintiff: Sarah Vitort
Defendant: The Kroger Company, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Case Number: 3:2020cv01317
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: John V Acosta
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332cl
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time #5 . Deadline for defendants to file a response is extended to 11/5/2020. (pjg)
September 29, 2020 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.. (Kono, Kevin)
September 29, 2020 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by The Kroger Company. (Kono, Kevin)
September 29, 2020 Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Filed by Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., The Kroger Company. (Kono, Kevin)
August 21, 2020 Filing 4 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. waiver sent on 8/7/2020. Filed by Sarah Vitort. (Piucci, Joseph)
August 21, 2020 Filing 3 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by The Kroger Company waiver sent on 8/7/2020. Filed by Sarah Vitort. (Piucci, Joseph)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/4/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/4/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 1/4/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (jn)
August 6, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7077304 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Sarah Vittort against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Piucci, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vitort v. The Kroger Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kroger Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Vitort
Represented By: Joseph E. Piucci
Represented By: Gillian L. Wade
Represented By: Sara D. Avila
Represented By: Stephen V. Piucci
Represented By: M. Ryan Casey
Represented By: Marc A. Castaneda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?