Menefee v. Washington County Sheriffs Office et al
| LeAndrew Laronn Menefee |
| Washington County Sheriffs Office, Washington County Jail and All Deputies Involved |
| 3:2020cv01501 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order #3 sent to LeAndrew Laronn Menefee returned as undeliverable. (joha) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Case Assignment Notice #2 sent to LeAndrew Laronn Menefee returned as undeliverable. (joha) |
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff must submit the $400.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed on 9/2/2020 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Application IFP and this Order Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/3/2020.) (joha)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/1/2020.) (joha) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. (NO IFP Filed, NO Filing Fee Paid) Filed by LeAndrew Laronn Menefee against All Deputies Involved, Washington County Jail, Washington County Sheriffs Office. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
