Thomas v. De La Rosa
| Ashton Thomas |
| Miriam De La Rosa and Miriam Thomas |
| 3:2020cv01502 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Stacie F Beckerman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court's examination of Thomas' application to proceed in forma pauperis reveals that Thomas is unable to afford the filing fee, and therefore the Court GRANTS Thomas' Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #1 ). However, the Court ORDERS Thomas to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to state a claim. Thomas may do so by filing an amended complaint stating a civil cause of action. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause by 10/26/2020 will result in the Court's dismissal of this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 10/5/2020 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Mailed to Plaintiff on 10/6/2020.) (gw)
|
| Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (joha) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/1/2020.) (joha) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Ashton Thomas against Miriam De La Rosa. (joha) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Ashton Thomas. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
