DeVore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Raymond Earl DeVore |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons and Select Officials |
| 3:2020cv01646 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Raymond Earl DeVore. (joha) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Within thirty days from the date of this Order, plaintiff must submit the full filing fee of $400.00 or a completed IFP application authorizing deductions from his trust account. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #2 is DENIED with leave to renew. Signed on 10/26/2020 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed order and IFP application to Pro Se party on 10/26/2020.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (joha) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/23/2020.) (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Raymond Earl DeVore. (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. NO FEE, NO IFP. Filed by Raymond Earl DeVore against Federal Bureau of Prisons, Select Officials. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
