Smith v. Black & Veatch Corporation et al
Joshua Smith |
Derrick Draper and Black & Veatch Corporation |
3:2020cv01667 |
September 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Stacie F Beckerman |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan. Filed by Black & Veatch Corporation. (Buchanan, Paul) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) . Filed by Black & Veatch Corporation. (Buchanan, Paul) |
Filing 6 Notice of Dismissal of Party Filed by Joshua Smith. (Thompson, Eliot) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Black & Veatch Corporation. (Buchanan, Paul) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Responsive Pleadings. Filed by Black & Veatch Corporation, Derrick Draper. (Buchanan, Paul) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case No. 20CV29128 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7276998 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Derrick Draper, Black & Veatch Corporation (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Declaration in Support of Removal, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A in Support of Removal). (Buchanan, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.