Good George LLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
| GOOD GEORGE LLC |
| THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY and Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| 3:2020cv01705 |
| October 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
RECORD OF ORDER: In light of defendant Cincinnati Casualty Company's lack of opposition to the motion to consolidate this case with Mississippi Productions, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, CV No. 3:20-cv-01711-AC ("Mississippi") for Rule 12 motions practice, Good George LLC's motion to consolidate (ECF No. #10 ) is GRANTED with respect to Mississippi. The motion is deferred with respect to consolidation with Ringside, Inc. v. Cincinnati Casualty Company, CV No. 3:20-cv-01709-AC ("Ringside") pending filing of the expected motions to dismiss to allow the court to determine if the issues raised in the Ringside motion are substantially similar to those raised in the motions to dismiss filed in this case and Mississippi. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
|
|
Filing 21
Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Good George LLC. (Row, Seth)
|
|
Filing 20
Reply in Support of to Motion to Consolidate Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate for Rule 12 Motions Practice #10 . Filed by Good George LLC. (Row, Seth)
|
|
Filing 19
Response in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate for Rule 12 Motions Practice #10 . Filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Williams, Richard)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge Acosta: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Attorney G. David Rubin #16 and Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Hayk Ghalumyan #17 . (pjg)
|
|
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Hayk Ghalumyan. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7481058 #17 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)
|
|
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney G. David Rubin. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7480994 #16 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)
|
|
Filing 17
Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Hayk Ghalumyan. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7481058. Filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Bernstein, Lloyd)
|
|
Filing 16
Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney G. David Rubin. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7480994. Filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Bernstein, Lloyd)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Acosta: granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #14 . Answer is due by 12/4/2020. (pjg) Modified text on 11/13/2020 (pjg).
|
|
Filing 14
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Defendant's Fourth Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint). Filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Williams, Richard)
|
|
Filing 13
Scheduling Order by Judge Acosta: Motion to Consolidate Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate for Rule 12 Motions Practice #10 is taken under advisement as of 11/23/2020. (pjg)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #11 . Answer is due by 11/20/2020. (pjg)
|
|
Filing 11
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Defendant's Third Unopposed Moton for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint). Filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Williams, Richard)
|
|
Filing 10
Motion to Consolidate Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate for Rule 12 Motions Practice. Filed by Good George LLC. (Row, Seth)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 . Answer is due by 11/6/2020. (pjg)
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint). Filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Bernstein, Lloyd)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Karin J. Immergut to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (eo)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice re Related Cases Filed by Good George LLC. (Row, Seth)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 2/8/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/8/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 3/8/2021. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (rs)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #3 is GRANTED. Defendant's response is due by October 23, 2020. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy)
|
|
Filing 3
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY. (Bernstein, Lloyd)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY. (Bernstein, Lloyd)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Removal of Case Number 20CV30519 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7307759 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Bernstein, Lloyd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
