Williams v. Console et al
Plaintiff: Ericka Y. Williams
Defendant: Salvatore Console, Christina Schlichten and Selby Brown
Case Number: 3:2020cv01788
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Marco A Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order for Administrative Correction of the Record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) regarding #6 Order. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The Document was incorrectly dated. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment.The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/23/2020.) (cw)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #1 and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint #2 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Thus, her motion for appointment of counsel #3 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint which cures the deficiencies noted shallresult in the dismissal of this proceeding, with prejudice. Signed on 11/20/2020 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/20/2020.) (jp) (Main Document 6 replaced on 11/23/2020) (cw).
October 26, 2020 Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (sss)
October 20, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/20/2020.) (sss)
October 16, 2020 Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Ericka Y. Williams. (sss)
October 16, 2020 Filing 2 Complaint. Filed by Ericka Y. Williams against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment). (sss)
October 16, 2020 Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Ericka Y. Williams. (sss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Console et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salvatore Console
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christina Schlichten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Selby Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ericka Y. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?