Williams v. Console et al
Ericka Y. Williams |
Salvatore Console, Christina Schlichten and Selby Brown |
3:2020cv01788 |
October 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Marco A Hernandez |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Order for Administrative Correction of the Record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) regarding #6 Order. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The Document was incorrectly dated. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment.The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/23/2020.) (cw) |
Filing 6 ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #1 and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint #2 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Thus, her motion for appointment of counsel #3 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint which cures the deficiencies noted shallresult in the dismissal of this proceeding, with prejudice. Signed on 11/20/2020 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/20/2020.) (jp) (Main Document 6 replaced on 11/23/2020) (cw). |
Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (sss) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/20/2020.) (sss) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Ericka Y. Williams. (sss) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Filed by Ericka Y. Williams against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment). (sss) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Ericka Y. Williams. (sss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.