Sodexo America LLC v. Concordia University
Sodexo America LLC |
Concordia University |
3:2020cv01880 |
October 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Karin J Immergut |
Michael W Mosman |
Contract: Other Contract Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Based upon the Court's Opinion and Order [ECF 20] and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend [ECF 22], the Court ENTERS judgment against Defendant Concordia University. The Court orders that Plaintiff Sodexo America, LLC recover from Defendant Concordia University the total amount of $641,585.99, including $552,296.02 of the original investment, $63,461.07 in unpaid interest, $24,376.00 in attorney fees, and $1,452.90 in costs. Post-judgment interest shall accrue in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1961. Signed on 4/6/21 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) Modified filing date on 4/6/2021 (pjg). |
Filing 25 MINUTES of Proceedings: Oral Argument held before Judge Michael W. Mosman. For the reasons stated on the record, Motion to Amend #22 is GRANTED. Amended Judgment to follow. David S. Mepham present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Court Reporter: Bonita Shumway. Judge Michael W. Mosman presiding. (dls) |
Filing 24 Scheduling Order by Judge Michael W. Mosman. The Oral Argument set for 3/22/2021 at 02:30PM is continued to 4/5/2021 at 01:30PM in Portland Courtroom 16 before Judge Michael W. Mosman, regarding Motion Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Order and Judgment #22 . Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) |
Filing 23 Scheduling Order by Judge Michael W. Mosman. Oral Argument is set for 3/22/2021 at 02:30PM in Portland Courtroom 16 before Judge Michael W. Mosman, regarding Motion Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Order and Judgment #22 . Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) |
Filing 22 Motion Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Order and Judgment. Oral Argument requested. Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) |
Filing 21 DEFAULT JUDGMENT: Based upon the Court's Opinion and Order [ECF 20], the Court ENTERS judgment against Defendant Concordia University. Plaintiff Sodexo America, LLC shall have a judgment against Defendant in the total amount of $631,938.99, including $552,296.02 of the original investment, $63,461.07 in unpaid interest, $14,729.00 in attorney fees, and $1,452.90 in costs. Post-judgment interest shall accrue in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1961. Signed on 2/25/2021 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms) |
Filing 20 Opinion and Order: I GRANT in part Sodexo's Motion for Default Judgment [ECF 15]. Default judgment shall be entered against Concordia in the amount $631,938.99, including $552,296.02 of the original investment, $63,461.07 in unpaid interest, $14,729.00 in attorney fees, and $1,452.90 in costs. Post-judgment interest shall accrue in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1961. Signed on 2/25/2021 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms) |
Filing 19 Declaration of David S. Mepham. Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Related document(s): Motion for default judgment #15 .) (Mepham, David) |
Filing 18 Supplement . Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Related document(s): Motion for default judgment #15 .) (Mepham, David) |
Filing 17 Affidavit of Christopher Elliott in Support of Motion for Default Judgment. Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Related document(s): Motion for default judgment #15 .) (Mepham, David) |
Filing 16 Declaration of Allison Van Horn in Support of Plaintiff Sodexo America, LLC's Motion for Default Judgment #15 . Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) Modified on 1/21/2021 to add link (ecp). |
Filing 15 Motion for Default Judgment . Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) |
Filing 14 Clerk's Entry of Default as to Concordia University (related document: #13 Motion for default ). (kms) |
Filing 13 Motion for Entry of Default . Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) |
Filing 12 First Supplemental Declaration in Support of Plaintiff Sodexo's Proof of Service Affidavit of Service upon Concordia University served on 12/10/2020 Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) |
Filing 11 Affidavit of Service (Titled by filer as: Declaration of Lisa S. Johnson in Support of Plaintiff Sodexo's Proof of Service) Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) Modified on 12/30/2020 (sss). |
Filing 10 Affidavit of Service upon Concordia University served on 11/13/2020 (Titled by filer as: Declaration of Lisa S. Johnson in Support of Plaintiff Sodexo's Proof of Service) Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) Modified on 12/30/2020 (sss). |
Filing 9 Summons Issued Electronically as to Concordia University. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp) |
Filing 8 Proposed Summons Concordia University agents Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to Concordia University. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons Secretary of State as agent for Concordia University Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) |
Filing 5 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Karin J. Immergut to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (eo) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Concordia University. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (sb) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 3/1/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/29/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 3/29/2021. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (sb) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Sodexo America LLC. (Mepham, David) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7437621 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Sodexo America LLC against Concordia University (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Mepham, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sodexo America LLC v. Concordia University | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Concordia University | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sodexo America LLC | |
Represented By: | David S. Mepham |
Represented By: | Ramon Henderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.