Conachy v. Empirical Financial Services, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Martin Conachy
Defendant: Kenneth Robert Smith and Empirical Financial Services, LLC a Washington limited liability company doing business as Empirical Wealth Management
Case Number: 3:2020cv01912
Filed: November 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Jolie A Russo
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2020 Filing 8 Affidavit of Service upon Empirical Financial Services, LLC served on 11/25/2020; Kenneth Robert Smith served on 11/25/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Acceptance of Service) Filed by Joseph Martin Conachy. (Butterfield, Lisanne)
November 19, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to Empirical Financial Services, LLC, Kenneth Robert Smith. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha)
November 19, 2020 Filing 6 Amended Proposed Summons Kenneth Robert Smith Filed by Joseph Martin Conachy. (Butterfield, Lisanne)
November 19, 2020 Filing 5 Amended Proposed Summons to Empiricial Financial Services, LLC Filed by Joseph Martin Conachy. (Butterfield, Lisanne)
November 18, 2020 Filing 4 Proposed Summons to Kenneth Robert Smith Filed by Joseph Martin Conachy. (Butterfield, Lisanne)
November 18, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons to Empirical Financial Services, LLC Filed by Joseph Martin Conachy. (Butterfield, Lisanne)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 3/8/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 4/5/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 4/5/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (joha)
November 5, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7456468 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Joseph Martin Conachy against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Butterfield, Lisanne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conachy v. Empirical Financial Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Martin Conachy
Represented By: Lisanne M. Butterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Robert Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Empirical Financial Services, LLC a Washington limited liability company doing business as Empirical Wealth Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?