Belknap v. Alphabet, Inc. et al
| Craig Belknap |
| Alphabet, Inc., YouTube, Inc. and Google, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv01989 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT - Based on the Court's OPINION AND ORDER, IT IS ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed on 12/29/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Mailing regarding Opinion and Order #2 Mailed to Plaintiff on 12/1/2020. (mja) |
|
Filing 2
Opinion and Order - The Count GRANTS Belknap's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF #1 ). The Court DISMISSES Belknap's Complaint (ECF #1 ) for failure to state a claim. For the same reason, the Court DENIES Belknap's Motion to Enjoin Defendants (ECF #1 ). Belknap may file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days if he is able to cure the deficiencies discussed in this Opinion and Order. Failure to file an amended complaint curing the defects identified will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed on 12/1/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Filing 1 Motion to Enjoin Alphabet, Inc., et al from Censoring Breitbart and Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Craig Belknap. (eo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
