Mogler v. Hendrix
Petitioner: Jason Todd Mogler
Respondent: Warden Dwayne Hendrix
Case Number: 3:2020cv02174
Filed: December 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Stacie F Beckerman
Referring Judge: John Jelderks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Denying as Moot Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #7 in light of the Court's previous Order #6 appointing the Federal Public Defender to represent Petitioner in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (ki)
January 6, 2021 Filing 8 Declaration of Jason Todd Mogler in Support of Motion to Appoint Counsel #7 . Filed by Jason Todd Mogler. (joha)
January 6, 2021 Filing 7 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Jason Todd Mogler. (joha)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: In the interests of justice, the Court appoints the Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, to represent the petitioner in this proceeding. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B) ("Whenever... the court determines that the interests of justice so require, representation may be provided for any financially eligible person who--... is seeking relief under section 2241, 2254, or 2255 of title 28."). A copy of the Petition is attached to this order. The Court advises counsel that petitioner has not yet paid the $5 filing fee or submitted an in forma pauperis application. Ordered on 12/30/2020 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Mailed to Petitioner on 12/30/2020.) (gw)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit the $5.00 filing fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within thirty days of the date of this Order. Petitioner is advised that his failure to do so shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 12/28/2020 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Mailed order and IFP application to Pro Se party on 12/29/2020.) (dsg)
December 28, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Karin J. Immergut to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/28/2020.) (sss)
December 22, 2020 Filing 3 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge John Jelderks to Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/23/20.) (eo)
December 15, 2020 Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/15/2020.) (dsg)
December 14, 2020 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal). NO FEE, NO IFP. Filed by Jason Todd Mogler against Dwayne Hendrix. (dsg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mogler v. Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jason Todd Mogler
Represented By: Lisa Hay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Dwayne Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?