Swint et al v. United States et al
Robert James Swint and Chrystal Marie Meyer |
Dish Network, United States, YouTube and International Paper |
3:2020cv02177 |
December 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mark D Clarke |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JUDGMENT: This action is DISMISSED. Signed on 1/14/2021 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/14/2021.) (dsg) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed IFP and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF Nos. #1 , #3 ) are DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. Signed on 1/14/2021 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/14/2021.) (dsg) |
Filing 7 Declaration of Robert James Swint. Filed by Robert James Swint. (joha) |
Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (rs) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons Filed by Robert James Swint. (dsg) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/15/2020.) (dsg) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Robert James Swint. (dsg) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Robert James Swint against Dish Network, International Paper, United States, YouTube. (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Robert James Swint. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.