Romero-Omana v. Dickison et al
| Vicente Romero-Omana |
| Calbrecht and Lynne Dickison |
| 3:2021cv00134 |
| January 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Response to Order #5 . Filed by Vicente Romero-Omana. (Related document(s): Order on motion/application for leave to proceed ifp, #5 .) (dsg) |
| Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (joha) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is DENIED. Plaintiff must submit the requisite filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to submit the fee shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 2/3/2021 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/4/2021.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/28/2021.) (joha) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Vicente Romero-Omana. (joha) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Vicente Romero-Omana against All Defendants. (joha) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Vicente Romero-Omana. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
