Deerwater v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Titania Deerwater |
| Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, First Premier Bank and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00159 |
| January 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #13 . Deadline for Defendant First Premier Bank to file an answer to the complaint is extended to 4/2/2021. (pjg)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer respond to Complaint, #1 . Filed by First Premier Bank. (Fransen, Timothy) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #11 by Attorney Katherine A. Neben. (pjg)
|
| Filing 11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Katherine A. Neben. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7997458. Filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Sondag, Samantha) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Katherine A. Neben. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7997458 #11 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #7 . Answer is due by 3/22/2021. (pjg)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Sondag, Samantha) |
| Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Sondag, Samantha) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer respond to Complaint, #1 . Filed by First Premier Bank. (Fransen, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance of Timothy J. Fransen appearing on behalf of First Premier Bank Filed by on behalf of First Premier Bank. (Fransen, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 2/8/2021, answer due on 3/1/2021. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed as to First Premier Bank served on 2/8/2021, answer due on 3/1/2021. (Schumacher, Kyle) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., First Premier Bank. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (sss) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 6/1/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/30/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 6/30/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (sss)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7848236 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Titania Deerwater against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons). (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
