Campbell v. State of Oregon et al
| Matthew Campbell |
| Oregon DHS, State of Oregon, Multnomah County and Cares NW |
| 3:2021cv00369 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Matthew Campbell. (joha) |
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff has 30 days to submit a signed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If plaintiff fails to do so, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send plaintiff a form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed on 3/15/2021 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Order and IFP Form Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/15/2021.) (joha)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/12/2021.) (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Matthew Campbell against Cares NW, Multnomah County, Oregon DHS, State of Oregon. (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Matthew Campbell. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
