M.J.G. et al v. State or Oregon
| M.J.G., a minor, by and through John Schroedel, her Guardian Ad Litem, M.L.G., a minor, by and through Scott Kocher, her Guardian Ad Litem, M.G.J., a minor, by and through Gabriel Chase, his Guardian Ad Litem, M.J.G., M.G.J. and M.L.G. |
| State or Oregon, by and through its Department of Human Services, Amy Hall, State of Oregon, Clara Aguilar, Madeleine McConnell and Shirley Vollmuller |
| 3:2021cv00378 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #11 is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendants to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss #6 is extended until 14 days after this Courts decision on Motion to Certify #9 . Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
| Filing 12 Response "Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's' Motion to Certify Question to Oregon Supreme Court" to Motion #9 . Filed by All Defendants. (White, Tracy) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply "Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss" to Motion to Dismiss #6 . Filed by All Defendants. (White, Tracy) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Defendants shall respond to Motion to Certify Question #9 by 04/29/2021. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
| Filing 9 Motion to Certify Question to Oregon Supreme Court . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Lamborn, Joshua) Modified docket text per pleading title on 4/20/2021 (jtj). |
| Filing 8 Declaration of Josh Lamborn . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Related document(s): Response in Opposition to Motion #7 .) (Lamborn, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss #6 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Lamborn, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss . Filed by All Defendants. (White, Tracy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint #3 is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendants to file a response to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is 04/02/2021. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #1 Notice of Removal. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The incorrect PDF was attached at filing. The initial notice of removal did not include additional defendants added in state court by amended complaint. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF that includes the additional defendants has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment. The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (eo) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint. Filed by All Defendants. (White, Tracy) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 7/13/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 8/12/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 8/12/2021. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (jtj)
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19CV43547 from Washington County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7989347 issued.. Filed by State or Oregon, by and through its Department of Human Services. (White, Tracy) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/26/2021) (eo). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
