Stoker v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Gregory Dean Stoker |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00432 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 3/29/2021, answer due on 7/27/2021. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Michael W. Mosman to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (sss)
|
|
Filing 6
Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #2 by attorney Edward A. Wicklund. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha)
|
|
Filing 3
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (joha)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Edward A. Wicklund. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8001470. Filed by Gregory Dean Stoker. (Attachments: #1 Attachment List of admitted courts) (Bordelon, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8001437. Filed by Gregory Dean Stoker against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit "A" - Appeals Council denial). (Bordelon, Jeremy)
|
|
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Edward A. Wicklund. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8001470 #2 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stoker v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Dean Stoker | |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Represented By: | Jeremy L. Bordelon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
