Giffen v. United States et al
Petitioner: Todd Giffen
Respondent: United States, Warden Butner FMC and US Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2021cv00440
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: John V Acosta
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order from USCA for the 9th Circuit, USCA # 21-35306 re Notice of Appeal #7 .Order to show cause docket fee due. (jtj)
April 22, 2021 USCA Case Number and Notice confirming Docketing Record on Appeal re Notice of Appeal #7 . Case Appealed to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 21-35306 assigned. (jtj)
April 19, 2021 Filing 7 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit regarding order at #5 . (No IFP Granted and No Fee Paid). Filed by Todd Giffen. (jw)
April 6, 2021 Filing 6 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is dismissed. DATED this 6th day of April, 2021, by Chief United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/6/2021.) (pjg)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas #1 is summarily DISMISSED. The court DENIES petitioner's Emergency Motion for Appointment of Counsel #2 and Emergency Motion for Release #4 . Signed on 4/1/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/2/2021.) (dsg)
March 31, 2021 Filing 4 Emergency Motion for Release. Filed by Todd Giffen. (bd)
March 23, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 03/23/2021.) (bd)
March 22, 2021 Filing 2 Emergency Motion for Appointment of Counsel; Motion for Aids, Services, Accommodations; FRCP 17(c) Motion for Protective Order. Filed by Todd Giffen. (bd)
March 22, 2021 Filing 1 Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal) Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected. Receipt No. ORX600013727 issued. Filed by Todd Giffen against US Attorney General, United States, Warden Butner FMC. (bd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giffen v. United States et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Butner FMC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: US Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Todd Giffen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?