Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. E TOP, LLC et al
Epson Portland Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc. |
Shuping Hong Hurley, E TOP, LLC and Xuming Hong |
3:2021cv00484 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
John V Acosta |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Elizabeth White is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Brenna K. Legaard Filed by All Plaintiffs. (White, Elizabeth) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #11 . Deadline for Answer is extended to 5/24/2021. (pjg) |
Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, #1 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Legaard, Brenna) |
Filing 10 Patent Report: This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent. (sb) |
Filing 9 Return of Service Executed as to All Defendants. Service specifically made upon Other Agency. (Legaard, Brenna) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #6 for Attorney Tigran Guledjian and Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 for Attorney Richard H. Doss. (pjg) |
Filing 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Richard H. Doss. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8022194. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Legaard, Brenna) |
Filing 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Tigran Guledjian. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8022153. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Legaard, Brenna) |
Filing 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO Form 120). Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Legaard, Brenna) Modified on 4/7/2021 to add language (sb). |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Tigran Guledjian. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8022153 #6 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Richard H. Doss. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8022194 #7 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to E TOP, LLC, Xuming Hong, Shuping Hong Hurley. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (sb) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 7/29/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 8/30/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 8/30/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (sb) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Legaard, Brenna) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8018626 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland Inc. against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Proposed Summons). (Legaard, Brenna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.