Kanu v. Hendrix
Alpha Kanu |
DeWayne Hendrix |
3:2021cv00800 |
May 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael J McShane |
Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Brief in Support of Petition titled "Reply to Government's Response to Petition for Writ". Filed by Alpha Kanu. (joha) |
Filing 12 Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Enforcement of the Second Chance Act. Filed by Alpha Kanu. (dsg) |
Filing 11 Declaration of Stacey Morales in Support of Response to Habeas Petition. Filed by DeWayne Hendrix. (Related document(s): Response to Habeas Petition (2241) #10 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C) (Rice-Stitt, Austin) |
Filing 10 Response to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 . Filed by DeWayne Hendrix. Petitioners brief is due by 8/30/2021. Habeas Petition is taken under advisement as of 9/13/2021. (Rice-Stitt, Austin) |
Filing 9 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the US Attorney on behalf of Respondent Filed by DeWayne Hendrix. (Rice-Stitt, Austin) |
Filing 8 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (bd) |
Filing 7 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 #2 on respondent. Signed on 06/08/2021 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service, #2 Petition) (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 06/09/2021.) (Sent order, acceptance and petition to USAO via interoffice mail.) (bd) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner's IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. At this time, the appointment of counsel is not required in the interests of justice, and petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #5 ) is DENIED with leave to renew upon receipt of Respondent's Answer. Signed on 06/08/2021 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 06/09/2021.) (bd) |
Filing 5 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Alpha Kanu. (dsg) |
Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/25/2021.) (dsg) |
Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal). In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Alpha Kanu against DeWayne Hendrix. (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Alpha Kanu. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kanu v. Hendrix | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Alpha Kanu | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: DeWayne Hendrix | |
Represented By: | Austin Rice-Stitt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.