Kurisu et al v. Svenhard's Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan et al
Kerry Kurisu, Douglas Prola and Bill Pruitt |
Ronny Svenhard, Svenhard's Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan, James Kohles, Michelle Barnett, David Kunkel, Central California Baking Company, United States Bakery and Mountain States Bakeries LLC |
3:2021cv00912 |
June 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael H Simon |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE TO NON-ADMITTED COUNSEL: This case has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon from the Northern District of California (San Francisco). Our records indicate that you are not admitted to practice in the District of Oregon. Admissions information is governed by #LR 83, and information about the admissions process is available on the #admissions page of the Court website. (eo) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (eo) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Case Transferred from the Northern District of California (San Francisco) per the attached transfer order. Filed by Bill Pruitt, Douglas Prola, Kerry Kurisu against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Transfer Order). (eo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.