Fakhry v. Miller et al
Plaintiff: Aly Ahmed Fakhry
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Richard Miller and Merrick Garland
Case Number: 3:2021cv00946
Filed: June 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Jolie A Russo
Nature of Suit: Naturalization, Petition for Hearing of Denial
Cause of Action: 8 U.S.C. ยง 1447
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Sean Lynden King appearing on behalf of Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Richard Miller. Filed by Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Richard Miller. (King, Sean)
July 21, 2021 Filing 4 Affidavit of Service upon All Defendants Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Smith, Philip)
June 25, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Richard Miller. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (kgc)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/25/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/22/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 11/22/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (kgc)
June 25, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8136010 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Aly Ahmed Fakhry against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Permanent Resident card, #2 Exhibit Order granting asylum, #3 Exhibit Approval notice for permanent residence, #4 Exhibit N400 receipt notice, #5 Exhibit N400 Interview Notice, #6 Exhibit N400 Interview Results Notice, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Proposed Summons). (Smith, Philip)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fakhry v. Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Sean Lynden King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Miller
Represented By: Sean Lynden King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Sean Lynden King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aly Ahmed Fakhry
Represented By: Nicole Hope Nelson
Represented By: Philip James Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?