Chape v. Advanced Reporting LLC
Plaintiff: Jonathan Chape
Defendant: Advanced Reporting LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv00964
Filed: June 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael W Mosman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 . Attorney Joseph Gentilcore added. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
July 26, 2021 Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Joseph L. Gentilcore. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: BORDC-8167901 #7 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (sss)
July 23, 2021 Filing 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Joseph L. Gentilcore. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: BORDC-8167901. Filed by Jonathan Chape. (Gentilcore, Joseph)
July 2, 2021 Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Pay.gov Refund regarding Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8138532. The request has been granted and the amount of $402.00 will be refunded to Mark D. Mailman Related Doc #5 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. (lp)
June 29, 2021 Filing 5 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically regarding Refund Request Due, 2 . Filed by Jonathan Chape. (Stark, Whitney)
June 29, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Advanced Reporting LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jtj)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/27/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/26/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 11/26/2021. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (jtj)
June 29, 2021 Filing 2 A duplicate payment in the amount of $402.00 was submitted by Jonathan Chape in the above-referenced case. For information on refund procedures, visit #Requesting a Refund of Electronically Paid Fees on the Court website. Refund Request is Due 7/9/2021. (lp)
June 28, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8138560 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Jonathan Chape against Advanced Reporting LLC (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Stark, Whitney)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chape v. Advanced Reporting LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Chape
Represented By: Whitney B. Stark
Represented By: Joseph L. Gentilcore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Reporting LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?